About:
- The Bench held, “We find no constitutional infirmity in the OROP principle as defined in the government’s communication of November 7, 2015, on the implementation of the pension scheme.”
- The OROP scheme stipulated that benefits would be effective for pensioners from the cut-off date of July 1, 2014. Pensions of past pensioners would be refixed on the basis of pensions of retirees in the calendar year 2013.
- The Centre had promised that pensions of “all pensioners would be protected.” Finally, the scheme mandated the re-fixation of pension every five years.
- The judgment dealt with a petition filed by the Indian Ex-Servicemen Movement, complaining that pensioners of the same rank, who were a “homogeneous class”, were arbitrarily being given varying pensions under the OROP scheme.
- The amount of pension, they argued, should be uniform across armed forces personnel who retired with the same rank. They contended that the OROP had created a separate class among the personnel equally situated in rank and length of service. However, the court did not accept the argument.
About:
- Sealed cover jurisprudence is a practice used by the Supreme Court and sometimes lower courts, of asking for or accepting information from government agencies in sealed envelopes that can only be accessed by judges.
- While a specific law does not define the doctrine of sealed cover, the Supreme Court derives its power to use it from Rule 7 of order XIII of the Supreme Court Rules and Section 123 of the Indian Evidence Act of 1872.
- It is stated under the said rule that if the Chief Justice or court directs certain information to be kept under sealed cover or considers it of confidential nature, no party would be allowed access to the contents of such information, except if the Chief Justice himself orders that the opposite party be allowed to access it.
- It also mentions that information can be kept confidential if its publication is not considered to be in the interest of the public.
Criticism:
- Critics of this practice contend that it is not favourable to the principles of transparency and accountability of the Indian justice system, as it stands against the idea of an open court, where decisions can be subjected to public scrutiny.
- It is also said to enlarge the scope for arbitrariness in court decisions, as judges are supposed to lay down reasoning for their decisions, but this cannot be done when they are based upon information submitted confidentially.
Why is Russia trying to sell oil to India?
- This news comes in the backdrop of economic sanctions imposed by the West against Russia after the Russian military invaded Ukraine late last month.
- Russia has been trying to sell oil at a significant discount to India as demand for Russian oil has dropped since the U.S. and Europe imposed sanctions last month.
- As part of Western sanctions, certain Russian banks were removed from the SWIFT payments system, thus affecting Russia’s ability to trade with the rest of the world.
Why use the Chinese yuan instead of the U.S. dollar for oil trade?
- Major oil producers have for decades sold their produce to foreign buyers in exchange for U.S. dollars. Oil sellers have been willing to accept U.S. dollars for their oil because the currency is widely accepted in the global market for goods and services.
- Since global trade that is carried out using dollars is cleared by banks located in the United States, the U.S. government has the power to freeze dollars that belong to its adversaries which then debilitates economies.
- To avoid this risk, many countries have been looking at alternatives to the U.S. dollar to carry out international trade.
- Of late, China has emerged as a significant economic power and this in turn has boosted the value of the yuan in the eyes of people and made it an increasingly acceptable currency for global trade.
- However, it should be noted that only about 3% of global trade is facilitated by the Chinese yuan while almost 90% of global trade still happens through the use of U.S. dollars.
About:
- This came against the backdrop of a festering two-year-old dispute at the World Trade Organization involving India, the U.S., South Africa and the EU.
- This reprieve will, however, not apply to COVID-19 drugs and diagnostic devices, though the EU proposed a “discussion” on this in the next six months and also rebuffed India’s original demand for a waiver on intellectual property restrictions on COVID therapeutics.
- This waiver will allow pharmaceutical companies in developing countries not only to make but also, further down, export vaccines without explicit permission from the patent holders, said a version of the negotiation text that The Hindu has viewed.
About:
- Currently valid e-tourist visa issued for five years, which was suspended since March 2020, shall stand restored to nationals of 156 eligible countries with immediate effect.
- However, all land and riverine borders, including the Attari-Wagah post along Pakistan, will continue to remain shut, except for those with special permission.
- The Ministry said that the “instructions will not be applicable to Afghanistan nationals” who will continue to be governed by e-Emergency X-Miscellaneous Visa.
- Order for opening of Land ICPs (Integrated Check Posts) and riverine routes will be communicated separately.
About:
- Some of these issues are Fake job cards, widespread corruption, late uploading of muster rolls, huge pending payments for wages and materials and insufficient funding.
- Genuine labourers not getting their dues while money keeps changing hands due to collusion of unscrupulous elements surrounding the implementation of scheme at ground level is a bitter truth of the time.
- The Committee said that study visits and observations had shown that “rozgar sevak-s are in the habit of filling up kachha muster at the start and go to the Block once a week for online uploading of muster-rolls”.
- It noted that if the muster-roll is not updated and uploaded within the stipulated time, it could not be backdated, causing a loss in payment.
- Pending wages amounted to ₹4,060 crore, while material component payments are pending to the tune of ₹9,000 crore.
- The panel found it “alarming” that in such a scenario, the budget estimates for the scheme for 2022-23 were reduced from the ₹78,000 crore sought by the Department of Rural Development, to ₹73,000 crore.
About:
- These cities will now enter the deep engagement stage of the challenge wherein projects undertaken in pilot stage will be scaled up in a sustainable manner.
- The challenge was launched by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA) in collaboration with Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) on 15th April, 2021, to scale up the Eat Right India approach to city level.
- The EatSmart Cities Challenge has the objective of motivating Smart Cities to develop a plan that supports a healthy, safe and sustainable food environment.
- The Challenge is envisioned as a competition among cities to recognize their efforts in adopting and scaling up various initiatives under Eat Right India.
- All cities under the Smart Cities Mission, capitals of States/UTs and cities with population of more than 500,000 were invited to participate in the challenge.
About:
- These are namely
- IS 10500:2012 on Drinking Water – Specification and
- IS 17482:2020 on Drinking Water Supply Management System - Requirements for Piped Drinking Water Supply.
- IS 10500:2012 on Drinking Water – Specification and
- BIS quality standards are not mandatory for civic agencies engaged in supplying drinking water to houses across the country.
- Water Supply is a State subject and it is the responsibility of the State Government/Urban Local Bodies to plan, design, execute, operate and maintain the water supply systems.
About:
- Introduced in the 2016-17 kharif season, PMFBY is a central-state scheme which aims to cushion farmers against crop loss.
- The central and state governments pay more than 95 per cent of the premium amount while the farmer bears 1.5-5 per cent of the premium.
- As extensive usage of technology is used to settle the claims of farmers within a stipulated time period, farmers are required to fill loss reports online which are validated by insurance companies before the compensation amount is paid directly in their accounts.
- Prior to 2020, the scheme was mandatory for farmers who availed institutional finance, but that was changed and made voluntary for all farmers.
Criticism
- Since the beginning, farm leaders across the state have criticised the scheme for various reasons.
- One of the main arguments against it is that it helps insurance companies more than the farmers. Farm leaders claim insurance companies have made windfall gains at the behest of the public exchequer and farmers.
- Delayed payouts and denial of claims are other common complains against insurance companies.
- Gujarat, Bihar, West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Jharkhand have opted out of the scheme because of low claim ratio and financial constrains.
About:
- If the legislation, Sunshine Protection Act, passes in the House of Representatives as well, and is signed into law by President Joe Biden, it will come into effect in November 2023.
- The practice of turning clocks back by an hour to standard time every November will stop — and DST, which now starts in March, will be in effect all year round.
- DST is currently followed by some 70 countries twice a year.
Arguments for having Daylight Saving Time (DST)
- The key argument is that DST is meant to save energy.
- It involves resetting clocks ahead by an hour in spring, and behind by an hour in autumn, and those in favour of DST argue that it means a longer evening daytime. Individuals will complete their daily work routines an hour earlier, and that extra hour of daylight means — or is supposed to mean — a lower consumption of energy.